Bcrypt Generator

Bcrypt Generator

Free bcrypt hash generator and verifier — 100% client-side. Real-time cost benchmark, hash parser, code snippets for Node.js, Python, PHP, Go. No signup.

Updated June 2026

Zero Network Activity — 100% Browser-side
CLIENT-SIDE SECURE
12
4 — testing Default is 12 (OWASP). Higher = more secure but slower. 18 — very slow

Local Benchmark

Processing time on your current hardware

Cost 8
Cost 10
Cost 12
Cost 14

Implementation Snippets

const bcrypt = require('bcryptjs');
const SALT_ROUNDS = 12; // OWASP recommended

async function hashPassword(plaintext) {
  return await bcrypt.hash(plaintext, SALT_ROUNDS);
}

async function verifyPassword(plaintext, hash) {
  return await bcrypt.compare(plaintext, hash);
}

const hash = await hashPassword('user_password');
// '$2b$12$...' (60 chars, always different due to random salt)

const isValid = await verifyPassword('user_password', hash);
// true

How this bcrypt hash generator works

Generate a hash in under five seconds

1. Paste your password

The "CLIENT-SIDE SECURE" badge confirms no network request is ever made.

2. Adjust the cost factor

Slider from 4 to 18 — cost 12 is the OWASP-recommended default.

3. Generate and copy

The hash appears with the exact time it took on your hardware; copy it with one click.

What this bcrypt tool does

Beyond just generating the hash

Verifies an existing hash

The Verify Hash tab compares a password against a hash and shows a green check or a red X in milliseconds.

Benchmarks the cost factor

Measures the actual hashing time on your own hardware for each cost value, not a generic estimate.

Decodes an existing hash

Paste any bcrypt hash to see its version, cost, salt, and checksum broken apart into labeled pieces.

Ready-made code snippets

Generates equivalent hashing and verification code for Node.js, Python, PHP, Go, Java, Ruby, C#, and Rust.

100% client-side with bcryptjs

No password ever leaves your browser — confirm it yourself in the DevTools Network tab.

Examples

The same password never produces the same hash twice

Input
Bcrypt hash (cost 12)
mysecretpassword
$2b$12$nOUIs5kJ7naTuTFkBy1veuK0kSxUFXfuaOKdOKf9xYT0KKIGSJwFa
mysecretpassword (generated again)
$2b$12$aBcDeFgHiJkLmNoPqRsTuv... — different salt, both valid
72 vs. 100 'a' characters
produce equivalent hashes — bytes past 72 are silently ignored

When you'll reach for a bcrypt generator

The most common scenarios among people who use this tool

Authentication

Hash passwords before storing them; bcrypt.compare() confirms the match in constant time at login.

Migrating off a weak algorithm

Progressively re-hash MD5 or SHA-1 passwords to bcrypt the next time each user logs in successfully.

Calibrating the cost factor

Run the benchmark on production-equivalent hardware to find the highest cost that stays under your UX threshold.

Security audits

Paste an existing hash to verify its version, cost, and salt/checksum lengths without touching a database.

Check this before shipping to production

Cost 4–8 in production

These finish in under 1ms — no real resistance to brute force. Use cost 10 as an absolute minimum and 12 as the default.

Hashing an already-hashed hash

Produces a string that can never be verified again. Always hash the original plaintext password, never a previous hash.

The 72-byte limit

Bcrypt silently truncates anything past 72 bytes — long passphrases need a SHA-256 pre-hash or a switch to Argon2id.

Storing the salt separately

Unnecessary — bcrypt already embeds the salt inside the hash's 60 characters, so a separate salt column just adds complexity.

Why generate bcrypt hashes here

All hashing runs in your browser with bcryptjs, a pure JavaScript implementation — open DevTools and confirm the Network tab stays empty while you type.

The benchmark measures real time on your own hardware instead of a generic estimate, and ready-made snippets for eight languages skip the step of writing the library call by hand.

Bcrypt vs. Argon2id

Both solve password hashing; pick based on your project

Bcrypt
Argon2id
Current OWASP recommendation
solid alternative
first choice
Resistant to GPU/ASIC cracking (memory-hard)
no
yes
Password length limit
72 bytes
none
Broad language support
yes
growing
Adjustable cost factor
yes
yes (memory + time)

Frequently asked questions

OWASP recommends cost 12 as a starting point, targeting roughly 250ms per hash on modern hardware. Use this page's benchmark to measure your own server and pick the highest cost that stays under your UX threshold (300ms–1s).

References

Related article

Salt, Pepper, Bcrypt and Argon2id: How to Actually Protect Passwords

Related Tools